If one person says one thing, and three people say another, the three people are more likely to be believed. Of course, Brooke could say that they all have something against her and are lying because they don’t like her, but she’d have to give some kind of proof of that.

And I think that the Commissioner would be inclined to believe Sabrina over Brooke, if for no other reason then that she is pushing the promotion of Sabrina. This could be skewed by whatever relationship she has with Vincent, but, since we don’t know what that is, we can’t make that assumption just yet.

It all comes down to who is most believable, and I don’t think that’ll be Brooke, and probably not Vincent either. Sabrina seems to be naive, and this could be a good thing if there is evidence of it. ‘Look, she’s done this, that, and the other thing (pointing out evidence of her naiveté); of course she believed Vincent when he told her he was a wrestler.’ Maybe she should learn better, but a lot of naive people don’t.

It usually does get worse before it gets better.

Whether he’s secretly in league with Brooks or simply acting stupid, he could still come up with some fabricated story that can tilt everything any of the Upstrat Girls might have to say about the matter.

Sun and Krystin can’t really *prove* that Brooks didn’t tell Sabrina about Vincent being off limits. Brooke could have told Sabrina without Sun’s or Krystin’s knowlegde.

However, either of them could testify that Brooke was actively scheming to get Sabrina fired, which would discredit any claims Brooke could make in this affair.